Free of suspect political parties as well as the general public are also priorities changed and he does not have this issue with andolit-udvelit, but that doesn't mean that to resolve the matter already ruled out only 20-year-old to be this issue. it is several centuries old and even after independence, at least three or four times on the surface on the block has not been satisfied that is tackled in the framework of dhvans the Supreme Court From the RAE bareli Court asked to complete a quick hearing, because it is not the original case too far dhvanit will soon be brought to any initiative.
In the case of the Ayodhya structure nice dhvans Rae bareli court hearing to complete the quick as well as does the Supreme Court considered that the disputed Ayodhya site ownership dispute delays salvage of why? The case is pending before the plea itself. in the Allahabad High Court's Lucknow bench's decision in September 2010 was filed against a petition would not progress far. why, the answer to this question, the Supreme Court alone.
This does not deny that there are many other important cases before the Supreme Court, but ignores any of the Ayodhya. this case needs to be brought on a priority basis, because all sides are saying that the Supreme Court will decide that it would be valid to them. in these circumstances it is no justification to delay the final decision mirrored that in the final part of the top court. Need a decision then may be related parties to resolve the dispute through dialogue have agreed to.
The truth is that the world's attention to the country and to solve the dispute that the most relevant measures of related parties to arrive at a solution through dialogue. in the case of the judiciary as faith difficult to decide to resolve the Ayodhya issue through dialogue. could have been if the various parties made this dispute not of narrow politics. it is unfortunate that belief Connected it to some political parties vote has become a tool of the Bank to the certificate that is issued by means of communal and who doesn't? At the moment it is difficult to say that the Supreme Court case on the disputed site when the ownership will be brought, but the interest of the society and the nation is that this dispute through mutual negotiations quickly.
